Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
en:tabisuke [2017/06/13 23:15] pdadmin |
en:tabisuke [2017/06/15 04:41] (current) pdadmin |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| Presentation draft | Presentation draft | ||
| - | About the speaker | + | https://wikimania2017.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions/Wikiparliament_-_enhancing_both_freedom_and_efficiency_on_wiki%3F |
| - | A.k.a. Tabisuke | + | |
| - | Independent researcher | + | |
| - | Tokyo, Japan | + | |
| - | Table of contents | + | About the speaker |
| + | A.k.a. Tabisuke | ||
| + | Independent researcher | ||
| + | Tokyo, Japan | ||
| - | 1. The essence of parliamentary principles | + | Abstract |
| + | |||
| + | Table of contents | ||
| + | 1. The essence of parliamentary principles | ||
| + | | ||
| Freedom ---- Efficiency | Freedom ---- Efficiency | ||
| + | (x) central control | ||
| + | (o) autonomous distributed control | ||
| - | (x) central control | + | 2. Examples of parliamentary rules – traditional / for wiki |
| - | (o) autonomous distributed control | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | 2. Examples of parliamentary rules – traditional / for wiki | + | |
| Motion | Motion | ||
| Second | Second | ||
| Line 24: | Line 27: | ||
| Vote | Vote | ||
| - | 3. Vote | + | 3. Vote |
| + | |||
| A variety of votes – decision making | A variety of votes – decision making | ||
| Silence (no objection) | Silence (no objection) | ||
| Line 32: | Line 35: | ||
| Special majority vote | Special majority vote | ||
| Unanimous consent | Unanimous consent | ||
| + | | ||
| Low cost --- High cost | Low cost --- High cost | ||
| Low importance -- important | Low importance -- important | ||
| + | | ||
| Who should be a voter ? | Who should be a voter ? | ||
| Committer | Committer | ||
| Everyone | Everyone | ||
| - | Those who interested, e.g., those who edited the doc three times | + | Those who are interested, e.g., those who edited the doc three times |
| - | + | ||
| - | 4. Second | + | |
| + | 4. Second | ||
| + | | ||
| What is the object of seconding ? | What is the object of seconding ? | ||
| - | 5. Motion | + | 5. Motion |
| + | |||
| Which motion first ? | Which motion first ? | ||
| - | 6. Debate | + | 6. Debate |
| + | |||
| How to (effectively) debate ? | How to (effectively) debate ? | ||
| Motion centered | Motion centered | ||
| Line 57: | Line 60: | ||
| Visualize positions – pro/con/neither | Visualize positions – pro/con/neither | ||
| - | 7. Structuring policy debate and decision making | + | 7. Structuring policy debate and decision making |
| - | + | ||
| - | Separate out the facts and the values (weighting/prioritizing) | + | Separate out facts and values (weighting/prioritizing) |
| - | Pursuit consensus on the facts | + | Pursuit consensus on facts |
| - | Explicit confrontation and pursuit consensus on the values | + | Explicit confrontation and pursuit consensus on values |
| Vote + Calculation | Vote + Calculation | ||
| - | 8. A wikiparliament “maturity model” | + | 8. A wikiparliament “maturity model” |
| + | |||
| Level 1: Introduce seconding for editing | Level 1: Introduce seconding for editing | ||
| Level 2: Support drafting and publishing cycle with motion | Level 2: Support drafting and publishing cycle with motion | ||
| Line 72: | Line 75: | ||
| Level 5: Implement structural decision making | Level 5: Implement structural decision making | ||
| - | 9. Debate ! | + | 9. Debate ! |
| + | |||
| Pro/con ? | Pro/con ? | ||
| Suitable/unsuitable use case ? | Suitable/unsuitable use case ? | ||